Remotion 是否正在为动态图形构建 Lovable？
一个常见的问题是，Remotion 的下一步是否是构建一个允许提示动态图形的消费者工具。 答案是否定的！我们正在构建视频技术，并鼓励其他人（你！）来构建消费者工具。
🌐 A common question is whether the next step for Remotion is to build a consumer tool that allows for prompting motion graphics.
The answer is no! We're building video tech and are encouraging others (you!) to build consumer tools.
我们不擅长B2C
🌐 We are not good at B2C
打造一款消费品需要你建立能够转化的着陆页，启动营销活动，优化转化漏斗，并在更大规模上提供支持。
🌐 Building a consumer product requires you to build landing pages that convert, launch marketing campaigns, optimize the conversion funnel and provide support at a larger scale.
我们不擅长这些事情——我们的强项是开发视频技术，这恰好为那些正在构建产品的人提供了很好的支撑。
🌐 We're not good at any of these things - our strength is building out video technology that happens to be a great backbone for others who are building products.
任何人都可以获得我们的技术授权
🌐 Anyone can license our tech
许多公司已经通过我们的公司许可获得了我们的技术许可，并正在开发各种产品：视频编辑器、提示到视频工具、广告生成器等。
🌐 A lot of companies have already licensed our tech through our company license and are building a variety of products: Video editors, prompt-to-video tools, ad generators and more.
所以，很多人已经在使用 Remotion 构建面向消费者的工具，并且推进的速度远远超过我们曾经能做到的。
🌐 So, a lot of people are already building consumer tools using Remotion and are pushing way faster than we ever could.
我们很高兴提供支持，而不是与他们竞争。我们的激励是一致的——如果他们赢，我们也会赢。 如果你相信一个可以用 Remotion 构建的想法——我们会全力支持你！
🌐 We are happy to provide them rather than competing with them. Our incentives are aligned - if they win, we win too.
If you believe in an idea that can be built with Remotion - we're supporting you fully!
成为支柱真棒
🌐 Being the backbone is great
让我们举一个来自其他行业的例子：自从人工智能出现以来，许多代码审查产品相继推出：CodeRabbit、Cursor、Copilot Review、Greptile 以及更多产品。竞争非常激烈，业务也很困难！但是，人工智能底层供应商正在获胜，因为许多工具都是建立在它们之上的。
🌐 Let's take an example from another industry: Since AI, a lot of code review products have launched: CodeRabbit, Cursor, Copilot Review, Greptile and dozens more.
The competition is fierce and the business is tough! But, the providers of the AI backbone are winning because many tools are built on top of them.
深入探讨：在一个公司竞相打造最优秀 AI 模型的世界里，最大的赢家是作为支柱的 NVIDIA。
🌐 Going deeper: In a world where companies race to create the best AI model, the biggest winner is NVIDIA being the backbone.
构建能够创作的 软件
🌐 Building software that composes
除了这本身不是我们的强项之外，还有另一个方面是任何建设者都应该考虑的。
🌐 In addition to this just not being our strength, there is also another aspect that any builder should think about.
很多人喜欢将 Remotion 与 Claude Code 一起使用。
🌐 A lot of people enjoy using Remotion with Claude Code.
表面上看，这似乎只是一个简单的聊天界面，但 Anthropic 为使其能有现在这样的表现做了大量工作（权限模式、子代理、工具、技能、运行多会话的能力），它表现出色的一个重要原因是它与操作系统集成得很好（利用 UNIX 工具、命令行、文件系统）。
🌐 While on the surface, it looks like a simple chat interface, there is a lot of work done by Anthropic to make it work as well as it does (permission modes, subagents, tools, skills, ability to run multiple sessions) and a big reason why it works great is that it integrates well with the OS (leveraging UNIX utilities, the command line, the file system).
人们更喜欢使用 Claude Code，而不是使用集成在其他产品中的 AI，这并非巧合。
🌐 It's not a coincidence that people love using Claude Code way more than using an AI integrated into another product.
我们相信，如果我们花大量精力去构建自己的聊天界面，我们最终仍然会得到一个不如Claude Code的工具，而人们只是非常想使用Claude Code。
🌐 We believe that if we were to spend a lot of effort building our own chat interface, we're still going to end up with a tool that is not as good as Claude Code all while people just wanna use Claude Code badly.
凭借出色的执行力，Lovable在动态图形方面将会很出色，我们也希望成为其中一部分——但由于我们公司的基因是尝试用有限的资源创造一些大的东西，这并不是适合我们的使命。
🌐 With excellent execution, Lovable for motion graphics will be great and we want to be part of it - but with the DNA of our company being to try to create something big with few resources, it's not the right mission for us.
另请参阅
🌐 See also